Sales Tax

Navigating S.R.O. 350(I)/2024: Practical Compliance Guide for Sales Tax Input Adjustments in IRIS

A comprehensive legal analysis of FBR S.R.O. 350(I)/2024, examining sequential return filing rules, balance sheet electronic approvals, Annexure-C restrictions, and judicial remedies for blocked input tax.

Published 22 Oct 2026 Tax year 2025 Reviewed 22 Oct 2026

Executive Summary & Regulatory Background

The Federal Board of Revenue promulgated S.R.O. 350(I)/2024 amending the Sales Tax Rules, 2006. This statutory instrument introduces sequential electronic filing controls and pre-requisite electronic balance sheet verifications in the FBR IRIS system. Registered buyers are systematically prohibited from adjusting input tax under Section 8B if their corresponding suppliers have not submitted their respective Annexure-C returns.

Core Statutory Mechanisms of S.R.O. 350(I)/2024

  1. Sequential Return Submission: Under amended Rule 18, a registered person cannot submit Annexure-C for a tax period until the preceding month's return has been formally filed and reconciled.
  2. Electronic Balance Sheet Prerequisite: Manufacturers, commercial importers, and corporate entities must upload an electronically verified balance sheet reflecting verified commercial bank accounts registered with the FBR under Form 181.
  3. De-linking of Unverified Input Adjustments: The automated IRIS validation engine automatically delinks invoices where the supplier's declared sales value exceeds their capital-to-turnover ratio thresholds.

Practical Impact on Corporate Cash Flows

Corporate taxpayers frequently encounter sudden liquidity constraints when compliant transactions are blocked due to vendor-side non-compliance. Under Section 7 and Section 8B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, input tax adjustment is restricted to 90% of output tax for the month, and any disallowance of legitimate input invoices translates directly into increased immediate cash tax liabilities.

Judicial Precedents & Appellate Remedies

The Honorable High Court of Sindh and the Lahore High Court have repeatedly ruled that bona fide registered buyers who have satisfied the conditions of Section 73 (payment via banking channel from the business account) cannot be subjected to arbitrary penal forfeiture due to external default by upstream suppliers. Where notices are issued under Section 11 or Section 25, affected businesses should:

  • Maintain certified bank statements evidencing direct transfers under Section 73.
  • Secure active ATL verification certificates dated as of the invoice generation date.
  • Seek immediate administrative rectifications from the concerned Commissioner (Appeals) or file constitutional petitions where systemic portals block lawful statutory filing.

Taxpert Chambers assists corporate clients across Karachi and nationwide in restructuring vendor compliance covenants and representing enterprises before appellate authorities.

General information only. This article is not advice for your particular situation. Please speak to a Taxpert advisor before acting on it.